<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
<b:Source>
<b:Tag>rae-202304-0001</b:Tag>
<b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType>
<b:Year>2023</b:Year>
<b:PeriodicalName>Research in Agricultural Engineering</b:PeriodicalName>
<b:Volume>69</b:Volume>
<b:Issue>4</b:Issue>
<b:Pages>159-166</b:Pages>
<b:Author>
<b:Author><b:NameList>
<b:Person><b:Last>Adekanye</b:Last><b:First>Timothy</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Okunola</b:Last><b:First>Abiodun</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Moses</b:Last><b:First>Olumuyiwa</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Idahosa</b:Last><b:First>Endurance</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Boye</b:Last><b:First>Yisa</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Saleh</b:Last><b:First>Aminu</b:First></b:Person>
</b:NameList></b:Author>
</b:Author>
<b:Title>Mathematical modeling of drying parameters of moringa oleifera leaves in a cabinet drye</b:Title>
<b:Comments>This study focused on&#160;drying moringa leaves using a&#160;cabinet dryer. The impact of&#160;the 40, 50, and 60&#8239;&#176;C drying air temperatures on&#160;the moisture content of&#160;the leaves at&#160;a&#160;constant air velocity with variation in&#160;weight (40, 80, and 120&#8239;g) was considered. Ten drying models were fitted to&#160;the drying data to&#160;describe the drying parameters of&#160;moringa leaves. The best model was chosen based on&#160;the highest coefficient of&#160;determination (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;), and the lowest sum of&#160;square error (SSE) and root mean square error (RMSE) values. The Henderson and Pabis model best described the drying characteristics of&#160;the moringa leaves having the highest R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&#160;(0.9888) and lowest SSE (0.0401) and RMSE (0.0604). The effective moisture diffusivity increased with the temperatures ranging from 8.72 &#215; 10&lt;sup&gt;-9&lt;/sup&gt; to&#160;1.40 &#215; 10&lt;sup&gt;-8&lt;/sup&gt;&#160;m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;.s&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;. The activation energy ranged from 90.4636, 40.4884, and 22.7466 KJ.mol&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; for 40, 80, and 120&#8239;g, respectively.</b:Comments>
</b:Source>
</b:Sources>
