Res. Agr. Eng., 2004, 50(2):54-60 | DOI: 10.17221/4927-RAE

Static and dynamic tests of pear bruise sensitivity

J. Blahovec, V. Mareš, F. Paprštein
1 Czech University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Research Institute for Pomology, Ltd., Holovousy, Czech Republic

The paper is a continuation of the preceding research of bruising sensitivity applied to different pear varieties. This study was based on quasi-static fruit testing in compression between two plates. One part of the method is based on determining the hysteresis losses corresponding to the predetermined low level bruising. This paper contains an attempt to apply the hysteresis loss concept to dynamical impact tests, which are simpler and quicker then quasi-static ones. Moreover the impact tests are closer to the character of deformations that initiating the bruising process in real conditions. Nine pear varieties were tested quasi-statically by the method developed previously. The same varieties were tested also dynamically in a special pendulum with flat and round indentors. The results show that the dynamic test is less sensitive in determining the bruising susceptibility than the previous quasistatic one. Moreover the success of the dynamic test depends on the shape of the indentor. Acceptable results were obtained with a flat indentor in contrast to the round indentor. For the last modification of the indentor we obtained the results, from which it was practically impossible to determine the maximal value of the hysteresis losses at which no bruise spots were formed.

Keywords: pears; bruising; compression; impact; bruise volume; absorbed energy; hysteresis losses; degree of elasticity; quality; indentor; spherical; indentor with a flat head

Published: June 30, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Blahovec J, Mareš V, Paprštein F. Static and dynamic tests of pear bruise sensitivity. Res. Agr. Eng. 2004;50(2):54-60. doi: 10.17221/4927-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. BAJEMA R.W., HYDE G.M., 1998. Instrumented pendulum for impact characterization of whole fruit and vegetable specimens. Trans. ASAE, 41 (5): 1399-1405. Go to original source...
  2. BARREIRO P., 1999. Detailed procedure for fruit damaging. ASTEQ CA Newsletter, No 2: 3-5.
  3. BLAHOVEC J., 1999. Bruise resistance coefficient and bruise sensitivity of apples and cherries. Int. Agrophysics, 13: 315-321.
  4. BLAHOVEC J., 2001. Static mechanics and texture of fruits and vegetables. Res. Agr. Eng., 47: 144-169.
  5. BLAHOVEC J., MAREŠ V., 2003. Approximation of bruise spots in pears plotted against deformation parameters. Res. Agr. Eng., 49: 50-55. Go to original source...
  6. BLAHOVEC J., MAREŠ V., PAPRŠTEIN F., 2003. Static lowlevel pear bruising in a group of varieties. Sci. Agric. Bohem., 34: 140-145.
  7. BLAHOVEC J., PATOČKA K., BAREŠ J., MIKEŠ J., PAPRŠTEIN F., 1991. Vyšetřování otlačitelnosti jablek. Zahradnictví, 18: 195-204.
  8. BLAHOVEC J., PATOČKA K., BAREŠ J., 1997. Low-level bruising of stored apples due to quasi-static loading up to constant compression strain. J. Texture Stud., 28: 87-89. Go to original source...
  9. BLAHOVEC J., PATOČKA K., PAPRŠTEIN F., 1996. Inelasticity and bruising of cherries. J. Texture Stud., 27: 391-401. low-level bruising in pears. Res. Agr. Eng., 48: 41-46. Go to original source...
  10. BRUSEWITZ G.H., BARTSCH J.A., 1989. Impact parameters related to post harvest bruising of apples. Trans. ASAE, 32: 953-957. Go to original source...
  11. HOLT J.E., SCHOORL J., 1977. Bruising and energy dissipation in apples. J. Texture Stud., 7: 421-432. Go to original source...
  12. HOLT J.E., SCHOORL J., 1983. Fracture in potatoes and apples. J. Mater. Sci., 18: 2017-2028. Go to original source...
  13. HOLT J.E., SCHOORL J., 1984. Mechanical properties and texture of stored apples. J. Texture Stud., 15: 377394. Go to original source...
  14. JOHNSON, N.N., 1987. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  15. KAMPP J., NISSEN G., 1990. Impact damage susceptibility of Danish apples. Paper presented at International Workshop Impact Damage in Fruits and Vegetables, Valencia, 28-29 March.
  16. MATHEW R., HYDE G.M., 1997. Potato impact damage tresholds. Trans. ASAE, 40: 705-709. Go to original source...
  17. MOHSENIN N.N., 1970. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Vol. 1 Structure, Physical Characteristics and Mechanical Properties. New York, Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ.: 734.
  18. SCHOORL D., HOLT J.E., 1986. Post-harvest energy transformations in horticultural produce. Agric. Systems, 19: 127-140. Go to original source...
  19. STUDMAN C.J., 1995. A model of fruit bruising. Presented at the 2nd Australasian Postharvest Conference, Monash University Melbourne.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.