Res. Agr. Eng., 2005, 51(4):112-118 | DOI: 10.17221/4912-RAE

The comparison of two types sensors for ammonia emission continual measurement

J. Pecen, P. Zabloudilová
Technical Faculty, Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Measurement of the ammonia emissions by two different types of sensors (PHOTO ACOUSTICS analyzer INNOVA and SOLID STATE sensor SP-53) was carried out in laboratory with one material of litter, wood-shavings (with dry or wet material). The initial ammonia concentration and humidity of material were changed. The output data of these sensors were continually saved a processed. A small difference was found out between the output data of these sensors. The difference depends not only on ammonia concentration and humidity of material but also on the duration time from the beginning of measurement. All experiments of ammonia concentration were carried out with three initial values of humidity and ammonia concentrations within used material. The decrease of ammonia concentration (its velocity) in investigated material has been measured with laboratory device and registered for twelve or more hours during each experiment.

Keywords: ammonia emissions; solid state sensor; litter; wood-shavings

Published: December 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pecen J, Zabloudilová P. The comparison of two types sensors for ammonia emission continual measurement. Res. Agr. Eng. 2005;51(4):112-118. doi: 10.17221/4912-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. HORN M., CZAJOR A., 2002. Modeling, calibration and automatic recalibration of the zero point of semiconductor gas sensors. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference EUROSENSOR XVI. Prague, 15-18 September 2002. Prague, Czech Technical University: 1081-1082.
  2. JELÍNEK A., PECEN J., 2003. Verification of continual measuring methodology of ammonia emissions in animal husbandry. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 49: 1-6. Go to original source...
  3. LAUQUE P., BENDAHAN M., SEGUIN J.L., NGO L., KIEU A., KNAUTH P., 2004. Highly sensitive and selective room temperature NH3 gas microsensor using an ionic conductor (CuBr) film. Analytica Chimica Acta, 515: 279-284. Go to original source...
  4. PECEN J., 2005. The detector for continual measuring of ammonia emissions. In: Proceedings of International Conference Information Technologies and Control Engineering in Management of Production Systems. Prague, 20-22 September 2005. Tom II. Prague, Czech University of Agriculture in Prague: 162-168.
  5. REECE F.N., LOTT B.D., DEATON W., 1980. Ammonia in the atmosphere during brooding affects performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 59: 486-488. Go to original source...
  6. VAN DER HOEK K.W., 1998. Estimating ammonia emission factors in Europe: Summary of the work of the UNECE ammonia expert panel. Atmospheric Environment, 32: 315-316. Go to original source...
  7. ZAKRZEWSKI J., DOMANSKI W., 2002. More practical modeling of SnO2 gas sensor makes the measuring system simpler. In: Proceedings of the International Science Conference EUROSENSORS XVI. Prague, 15-18 September 2002. Prague, Czech Technical University: 334-337.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.