Res. Agr. Eng., 2008, 54(2):50-57 | DOI: 10.17221/8/2008-RAE

Airflow resistance of wheat bedding as influenced by the filling method

J. £ukaszuk1, M. Molenda1, J. Horabik1, B. Szot1, M.D. Montross2
1 Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland
2 Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA

A study was conducted to estimate the degree of variability of the airflow resistance in wheat caused by the filling method, compaction of the sample, and airflow direction. Two types of grain chambers were used: a cylindrical column 0.95 m high and 0.196 m in diameter, and a cubical box of 0.35 m side. All factors examined were found to influence considerably the airflow resistance. Gravitational axial filling of the grain column from three heights (0.0, 0.95 and 1.8 m) resulted in the pressure drops of 1.0, 1.3, and 1.5 kPa at the airflow velocity of 0.3 m/s. Consolidation of axially filled samples by vibration resulted in a maximum 2.2 times increase in airflow resistance. The tests with cubical sample showed that in axially filled samples the pressure drop in vertical direction was maximum 1.5 times higher than in horizontal directions. In the case of asymmetrically filled samples, the pressure drop at the airflow velocity of 0.3 m/s in vertical direction Z was found to be 1.3 of that in horizontal direction X and 1.95 times higher than with horizontal direction Y, perpendicular to X. Variations in airflow resistance in values comparable to that found in the present project may be expected in practice.

Keywords: airflow resistance; grain; drying; aeration; packing structure

Published: June 30, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
£ukaszuk J, Molenda M, Horabik J, Szot B, Montross MD. Airflow resistance of wheat bedding as influenced by the filling method. Res. Agr. Eng. 2008;54(2):50-57. doi: 10.17221/8/2008-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. ASAE D272.3 DEC01 (2003): Resistance to airflow of grains, seeds, other agricultural products and perforated metal sheets. ASAE Standards, 569-576.
  2. Brooker D.B., Baaker-Arkema F.W., Hall C.W. (1992): Drying and Storage of Grains and Oilseeds. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  3. Calderwood D.L. (1973): Resistance to airflow of rough brown and milled rice. Transactions of the ASAE, 16: 525-527, 532. Go to original source...
  4. Hood T.J.A., Thorpe G.R. (1992): The effects of the anisotropic resistance to airflow on the design of aeration systems for bulk stored grains. Agricultural Engineering Australia, 21: 18-23.
  5. Kumar A., Muir. W.E. (1986): Airflow resistance of wheat and barley affected by airflow direction, filling method and dockage. Transactions of the ASAE, 29: 1423-1426. Go to original source...
  6. £ukaszuk J., Molenda M., Horabik J. (2006): Influence of the method sample formation on airflow resistance in wheat. Acta Agrophysica, 8: 881-891. (in Polish)
  7. Navarro S., Noyes R. (2002): The Mechanics and Physics of Modern Grain Aeration Management. CRC Press, Boca Raton. Go to original source...
  8. Neethirajan S., Karunakaran C., Jayas D.S., White N.D.G. (2006): X-ray computed tomography image analysis 56 RES. AGR. ENG., 54, 2008 (2): 50-57 to explain the airflow resistance differences in grain bulks. Biosystems Engineering, 94: 545-555. Go to original source...
  9. Stephens L.E., Foster G.H. (1976): Grain bulk properties as affected by mechanical grain spreaders. Transactions of the ASAE, 19: 354-358. Go to original source...
  10. Stephens L.E., Foster G.H. (1978): Bulk properties of wheat and grain sorghum as affected by a mechanical grain spreaders. Transactions of the ASAE, 21: 1217-1221. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.