Res. Agr. Eng., 2010, 56(1):33-40 | DOI: 10.17221/23/2009-RAE

Modeling the mass of Iranian export onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties using some physical characteristics

R. Ghabel, A. Rajabipour, M. Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M. Oveisi
Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Mass modeling can be used for development of post-harvest equipment related to onion (Allium cepa L.) processing such as grading, packing and food production processes. There are instances in which it is desirable to determine relationships among crop physical characteristics. In this study, the mass of Iranian export onion varieties (Azarshahr and Sefide Qom) was predicted by using different physical characteristics applying linear models with three different classifications: (1) - single or multiple variable regressions of onion dimensional characteristics, (2) - single or multiple variable regressions of onion projected areas, (3) - estimating onion mass based on measured (actual) volume and volumes of assumed shapes (prolate spheroid and ellipsoid). The results showed that mass modeling of onion based on length and three projected areas are the most appropriate models in the first and second classification, respectively. In third classification, the highest determination coefficient was obtained for mass modeling based on the actual volume as R2 = 0.99 whereas corresponding values were 0.96 for both assumed onion shapes (prolate spheroid and ellipsoid), respectively. In economical and agronomical point of view, suitable grading system of onion mass was obtained based on length as nonlinear relation M = 0.035a2 - 1.64a + 36.137, R2 = 0.96.

Keywords: onion; vegetable; mass modeling; physical characteristics; grading

Published: March 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ghabel R, Rajabipour A, Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M, Oveisi M. Modeling the mass of Iranian export onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties using some physical characteristics. Res. Agr. Eng. 2010;56(1):33-40. doi: 10.17221/23/2009-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. Anonymous, 2006. Onion marketing strategy. Available at: www.phdeb.org.pk/MktStrategies/Onion.pdf
  2. ASAE Standard, 1998. Compression Test of Food Materials of Convex Shape. ASAE S368.3 MAR95.
  3. Chuma Y., Uchida S., Shemsanga H.H., 1982. Simultaneous measurement of size, surface area, and volume of grains and soybean. Transactions of the ASAE, 25: 1752-1756. Go to original source...
  4. Fraser B.M., Verma S.S., Muir W.E., 1978. Some physical properties of fababeans. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 22: 53-57. Go to original source...
  5. Frechette R., Zahradnik J., 1968. Thermal properties of the Mc Intosh apple. Transactions of the ASAE., 11: 21-24. Go to original source...
  6. Kabas O., Ozmerzi A., Akinci I., 2005. Physical properties of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus India L.) grown wild in Turkey. Journal of Food Engineering, 73: 198-202. Go to original source...
  7. Karababa E., 2006. Physical properties of popcorn kernels. Journal of Food Engineering 72: 100-107. Go to original source...
  8. Keramat Jahromi M., Rafiee S., Jafari A., Tabatabaeefar A., 2007. Determination of dimension and area properties of date (Berhi) by image analysis. In: Proceedings International Conference of Agricultural, Food and Biological Engineering and Post Harvest/ Production Technology, January 21-24, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
  9. Khoshnam F., Tabatabaeefar A., Ghasemi Varnamkhasti M., Borghei A., 2007. Mass modeling of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit with some physical characteristics. Scientia Horticulturae, 114: 21-26. Go to original source...
  10. Lorestani A.N., Tabatabaeefar A., 2006. Modeling the mass of Kiwi fruit by geometrical attributes. International Agrophysics, 20: 135-139.
  11. Malcolm E.W., Tappan J.H., Sister F.E., 1986. The size and shape of typical sweet potatoes. Transactions of the ASAE, 29: 678-682. Go to original source...
  12. Mohsenin N.N., 1986. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. New York, Gordon and Breach science publishers: 20-89.
  13. Marvin J.P., Hyde G.M., Cavalieri R.P., 1987. Modeling potato tuber mass with tuber dimensions. Transactions of the ASAE, 30: 1154-1159. Go to original source...
  14. Mirasheh R., 2006. Designing and making procedure for a machine determining olive image dimensions. [M.Sc. Thesis.], Karaj, University of Tehran.
  15. Peleg K., 1985. Produce Handling, Packaging and Distribution. Westport, AVI Publishing Company: 20-90.
  16. Safwat M.A., 1971. Theoretical prediction of volume, surface area, and center of gravity for agricultural products. Transactions of the ASAE, 14: 549-553. Go to original source...
  17. Sitkei G., 1986. Mechanics of Agricultural Materials. New York, Elsevier publisher: 25.
  18. Stroshine R. 1998. Physical Properties of Agricultural Materials and Food Products. Course manual. West Lafayette, Purdue University.
  19. Stroshine R., Hamann D.D., 1994. Physical Properties of Agricultural Materials and Food Products. Course manual. West Lafayette, Purdue University.
  20. Tabatabaeefar A., 2002. Size and shape of potato tubers. International Agrophysics, 16: 301-305.
  21. Tabatabaeefar A., Rajabipour A., 2005. Modeling the mass of apples by geometrical attributes. Scientia Horticulturae, 105: 373-382. Go to original source...
  22. Tabatabaeefar A., Vefagh-Nematolahee A., Rajabipour A., 2000. Modeling of orange mass based on dimensions. International Agricultural Science and Technology, 2: 299-305.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.