Res. Agr. Eng., 2012, 58(3):107-113 | DOI: 10.17221/57/2011-RAE

Bruise susceptibilities of kiwifruit as affected by impact and fruit properties

E. Ahmadi
Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Kiwifruit bruise damage is a common postharvest disorder that substantially reduces fruit quality and marketability. Fruit bruise cause tissue softening and make them more susceptible to undesired agents such as diseases-inducing agents. Factors that affect kiwifruit bruise susceptibility such as impact properties and fruit properties were investigated. Two bruise prediction models were constructed for the damage susceptibility of kiwifruit (measured by absorbed energy) using multiple linear regression analyses. Kiwifruits were subjected to dynamic loading by means of a pendulum at three levels of impact. Significant effects of acoustic stiffness, temperature and the radius of curvature and some interactions on bruising were obtained at 5% probability level.

Keywords: absorbed energy; dynamic impact; mechanical damage; postharvest; regression models

Published: September 30, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ahmadi E. Bruise susceptibilities of kiwifruit as affected by impact and fruit properties. Res. Agr. Eng. 2012;58(3):107-113. doi: 10.17221/57/2011-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. Abbott J.A., Massie D.R., 1995. Nondestructive dynamic force/deformation measurement of kiwifruit firmness. Transactions of the ASAE, 38: 1809-1812. Go to original source...
  2. Agar I.T., Massantini R., Hess Pierce B., Kader A.A., 1999. Postharvest CO2 and ethylene production and quality maintenance of fresh-cut kiwifruit slices. Journal of Food Science, 64: 433-440. Go to original source...
  3. Ahm adi E., Gha sse m z adeh H.R., Sade ghi M., Moghaddam M., Zarif Neshat S., 2010. The effect of impact and fruit properties on the bruising of peach. Journal of Food Engineering, 97: 110-117. Go to original source...
  4. Bajema R.W., Hyde G.M., 1998. Instrumented pendulum for impact characterization of whole fruit and vegetable specimens. Transactions of the ASAE, 41: 1399-1405. Go to original source...
  5. Bauchot A.D., Hallett I.C., Redgwell R.J., Lallu N., 1999. Cell wall properties of kiwifruit affected by low temperature breakdown. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 16: 245-255. Go to original source...
  6. Blahovec J., Paprštein F., 2005. Susceptibility of pear varieties to bruising. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 38: 231-238. Go to original source...
  7. Crisosto C.H., Garner D., Saez K., 1999. Kiwifruit size influences softening rate during storage. California Agriculture, 53: 29-32. Go to original source...
  8. Davie I.J., Banks N.H., Jeffery P.B., Studman C.J., 1996. Nondestructive measurement of kiwifruit firmness. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 24: 151-157. Go to original source...
  9. Duprat F., Grotte M., Pietri E., Loonis D., 1997. The acoustic impulse response method for measuring the overall firmness of fruit. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 66: 251-259. Go to original source...
  10. Gerschenson L.N., Rojas A.M., Marangoni A.G., 2001. Effects of processing on kiwifruit dynamic rheological behavior and tissue structure. Food Research International, 34: 1-6. Go to original source...
  11. Hertog M.L.A.T.M., Ben-Arie R., Roth E., Nicolai B.M., 2004. Humidity and temperature effects on invasive and non-invasive firmness measures. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 33: 79-91. Go to original source...
  12. Jeffry P.B., Banks N.H., 1994. Firmness - temperature coefficient of kiwifruit. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 22: 97-101. Go to original source...
  13. Manolopoulou H., Papadopoulou P., 1998. A study of respiratory and physico-chemical changes of four kiwi fruit cultivars during cool-storage. Food Chemistry, 63: 529-534. Go to original source...
  14. McGlone V.A., Kawano S., 1998. Firmness, dry-matter and soluble-solids assessment of postharvest kiwifruit by NIR spectroscopy. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 13: 131-141. Go to original source...
  15. Mencarelli F., Massantini R., Botondi R., 1996. Influence of impact surface and temperature on the ripening response of kiwifruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 8: 165-177. Go to original source...
  16. Menesatti P., Beni C., Paglia G., Marcelli S., Dandrea S., 1999. Predictive statistical model for the analysis of drop impact damage on peach. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 73: 275-282. Go to original source...
  17. Opara L.U., 2007. Bruise susceptibilities of Gala apples as affected by orchard management practices and harvest date. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 43: 47-54. Go to original source...
  18. Sfakiotakis E., Chlioumis G., Gerasopoulos D., 2005. Preharvest chilling reduces low temperature breakdown incidence of kiwifruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 38: 169-174. Go to original source...
  19. Strehmel N., Praeger U., Konig C., Fehrle I., Erban A., Geyer M., Kopka J., Dongen J., 2010. Time course effects on primary metabolism of potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber tissue after mechanical impact. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 56: 109-116. Go to original source...
  20. Talens P., Martinez-Navarrete N., Fito P., Chiralt A., 2001. Changes in optical and mechanical properties during osmodehydrofreezing of kiwifruit. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 3: 191-199. Go to original source...
  21. Van Linden V., Ketelaere B., Desmet M., De Baerdemaeker J., 2006a. Determination of bruise susceptibility of tomato fruit by means of an instrumented pendulum. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 40: 7-14. Go to original source...
  22. Van Linden V., Scheerlinck N., Desmet M., De Baerdemaeker J., 2006b. Factors that affect tomato bruise development as a result of mechanical impact. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 42: 260-270. Go to original source...
  23. Van Zeebroeck M., Van Linden V., Darius P., De Ketelaere B., Ramon H., Tijskens E., 2007a. The effect of fruit properties on the bruise susceptibility of tomatoes. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 45: 168-175. Go to original source...
  24. Van Zeebroeck M., Van linden V., Darius P., De Ketelaere B., Ramon H., Tijskens E., 2007b. The effect of fruit factors on the bruise susceptibility of apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 46: 10-19. Go to original source...
  25. Vergano P.J., Testin R.F., Newall W.C., 1991. Peach bruising: Susceptibility to impact, vibration, and compression abuse. Transaction of the ASAE, 34: 2110-2116. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.