Res. Agr. Eng., 2012, 58(4):148-154 | DOI: 10.17221/33/2012-RAE

Analysis of strength ratio of different hop strings

P. Heřmánek1, A. Rybka1, I. Honzík1, L. Vent2, B. Jošt1, J. Mašek1
1 Department of Agricultural Machines, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 CHMEL-Vent Ltd., Podbořany-Kněžice, Czech Republic

In plant-growing, minimization of impurities in the final product plays a more and more important role. One of the risky places that can influence the final purity of granules in hop growing is the way of hop strings hanging on the trellis supporting wire. The ideal state is when hop-field supporting wires stay clean and without any attachments after the hop vines had been pulled down. The article deals with different variants of hop strings hanging, a description of the measuring equipment, and a measurement of the pulling force itself at a field test, and a realization of break tests in laboratory conditions with both new and used wires and twines. Two-year results of field tests proved advantageousness of the hop string hanging variant in combination of a black annealed wire of 1.06 mm in diameter with a polypropylene twine of strength labelled as 12,500 in the form of a simple attachment, as well as variants combining the same wire and a jute twine labelled 2,200 × 2 in the form of a double attachment. Other variants using attachments made of jute or sisal are unsuitable due to a large number of fallen hopvines in vegetation period. Paper attachments will be put to further tests.

Keywords: pulling down; hops; wire; twine

Published: December 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Heřmánek P, Rybka A, Honzík I, Vent L, Jošt B, Mašek J. Analysis of strength ratio of different hop strings. Res. Agr. Eng. 2012;58(4):148-154. doi: 10.17221/33/2012-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. Heřmánek P., Rybka A., Honzík I., Mašek J., Vent L., 2011. Engineering problems during pulling-down of hop strings and their attachments. In: Engineering for Rural Development. Jelgava, Latvia University of Agriculture, Faculty of Engineering: 26-31.
  2. Puchmajer P., 1999. Pružnost a pevnost (Elasticity and Strength). Prague, Czech Technical University in Prague: 143.
  3. Rybka A., Heřmánek P., Honzík I., Mašek J., Vent L., 2011. Analysis of various implementations of hop strings during hop production. Plant, Soil and Environment, 57: 441-446. Go to original source...
  4. Vent L., Rybka A., Heřmánek P., Honzík I., 2011. Zhodnocení analýzy pevnosti chmelovodičů a jejich úchytů v tahu při sklizni chmele (Evaluation of strenght analysis of hop training wires and hanging elements in tension during the harvest). Mechanizace zemědělství, 61: 167-173.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.