Res. Agr. Eng., 2019, 65(2):48-55 | DOI: 10.17221/5/2018-RAE

An evaluation of the physical, dynamic and aerodynamic properties of olivesOriginal Paper

Abbas Akbarnia*,1, Mahdi Rashvand2
1 Department of Machine Design and Mechatronics, Institute of Mechanics, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Mechanic of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

The determination of the physical and mechanical properties of agricultural products has always been considered as the basis for the design and fabrication of transmission, grading, and processing equipment for agricultural products. Due to the increasing production of olives and the foreign exchange earnings from its trade, the mechanisation of harvesting and processing operations is inevitable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the physical, dynamic and aerodynamic properties of olive species in order to design and fabricate an olive oiling machine. In this research, four species of olives, namely the Manzanilla, Kalamata, Fishemi, and Oily, were used. The physical properties of the samples were completely different. The mean dimensions of the Manzanilla species are the largest and the Oily is smallest and were the inverse in relation to the sphericity index. To determine the mechanical properties of the samples, the test material was used at a speed of 8 mm.min-1. The results showed that the maximum and minimum power and energy of rupture were allocated to the Manzanilla and Oily species, respectively. The Oily samples have the most mechanical sensitivity when compared to the other samples. The aerodynamic properties of the olive species were measured using a wind tunnel. The highest velocity and drag coefficient were assigned to the Oily sample and the lowest values were assigned to the Kalamata sample.

Keywords: drag coefficient; fracture energy; fruit; mechanical properties

Published: June 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Akbarnia A, Rashvand M. An evaluation of the physical, dynamic and aerodynamic properties of olives. Res. Agr. Eng. 2019;65(2):48-55. doi: 10.17221/5/2018-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. El-Soaly I.S. (2008): Some physical and mechanical properties of olive fruits in (Ryayna-Khrian-Libyan Arab). Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 25: 899-909.
  2. Ghamary B., Rajabipour A., Borghei A.M., Sadeghi H. (2010): Physical properties of olive. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 12: 104-110.
  3. González-Montellano C., Fuentes J.M., Ayuga-Téllez E., Ayuga F. (2012): Determination of the mechanical properties of maize grains and olives required for use in DEM simulations. Journal of Food Engineering, 111: 553-562. Go to original source...
  4. Herrera-Cáceres C., Pérez-Galarce F., Álvarez-Miranda E., Candia-Véjar A. (2017): Optimization of the harvest planning in the olive oil production: A case study in Chile. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 141: 147-159. Go to original source...
  5. Hezbavi I., Fatahi F., Kazemi S., Minayi S. (2009): Some engineering properties of fruit and olive kernel. In: 18st National Conference in Food Industry, Mashhad, Oct 15, 2009: 36-41.
  6. Hoshyarmanesh H., Dastgerdi H.R., Ghodsi M., Khandan R., Zareinia K. (2017): Numerical and experimental vibration analysis of olive tree for optimal mechanized harvesting efficiency and productivity. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 132: 34-48. Go to original source...
  7. Kiliçkan A., Güner M. (2008): Physical properties and mechanical behavior of olive fruits (Olea europaea L.) under compression loading. Journal of Food Engineering, 87: 222-228. Go to original source...
  8. Laurier F.C. (2004): Design of watermelon pulp and juice extraction machine. In: ASAE/CSAE Anuual International Meeting, Ottawa, March 20, 2004.
  9. Lavasani S., Afkari A., Golmohammadi A., Abasi A. (2008): The effect of size and time after harvest on the physical and mechanical properties of common olive fruit varieties. In: Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization, Mashad, Aug 27-29, 2008: 89-99.
  10. Mohsenin N.N. (1986): Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Structure, Physical Characteristics and Mechanical Properties. 2nd Ed. New York, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
  11. Rahim H., Wahab M.A.M.A., Amin M.Z.M., Harun A., Haimid M.T. (2017): Technological adoption evaluation of agricultural and food sectors towards modern agriculture: Tomato. Economic and Technology Management Review, 12: 41-53.
  12. Sadeghi H. (2000): Planting and Harvesting of Olive. Karaj, Agriculture Education Center.
  13. Saracoglu T., Ucer N., Ozarslan C. (2011): Engineering properties and susceptibility to bruising damage of table olive (Olea europaea) fruit. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 13: 801-805.
  14. Tavakoli T. (2006): Mechanics of Agricultural Materials. 1st Ed. Tehran, Mechanical Engineering Department of Agricultural Machinery.
  15. Tavakoli M., Tavakoli H., Azizi M.H., Haghayegh G.H. (2010): Comparison of mechanical properties between two varieties of rice straw. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2: 50-54.
  16. Vursavuº K., Özgüven F. (2004): Mechanical behaviour of apricot pit under compression loading. Journal of Food Engineering, 65: 255-261. Go to original source...
  17. Zipori I., Dag A., Tugendhaft Y., Birger R. (2014): Mechanical harvesting of table olives: Harvest efficiency and fruit quality. HortScience, 49: 55-58. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.