Res. Agr. Eng., 2020, 66(4):140-145 | DOI: 10.17221/60/2020-RAE

Comparison of two electric vehicles in terms of real range in different types of operationsOriginal Paper

Veronika Štekerová*, Martin Kotek, Veronika Hartová
Department of Vehicles and Ground Transport, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Science Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Electromobility is currently seen as an effective way to reduce the production of harmful emissions from the transport sector and, thus, prevent further environmental pollution and the associated global warming. The article is focused on the comparison of selected types of electric vehicles (EVs) in terms of real range in different types of operations and environments. Firstly, the driving characteristics and operating parameters of the selected EVs were tested in operation, under different conditions and in different geographical environments. The test drives took place on a pre-selected route, which was the same for all the EVs. The pre-selected operating parameters were measured and monitored for the subsequent comparison. Also, the specific conditions under which the test runs took place, such as the outside temperature, geographic terrain or traffic conditions along the route, were also monitored. Then, the obtained data were evaluated and conclusions were made.

Keywords: electric vehicles; emission; test drives; electromobility; power consumption; electric tractor

Published: December 31, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Štekerová V, Kotek M, Hartová V. Comparison of two electric vehicles in terms of real range in different types of operations. Res. Agr. Eng. 2020;66(4):140-145. doi: 10.17221/60/2020-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. Ajanovic A., Haas R. (2016): Dissemination of electric vehicles in urban areas: Major factors for success. Energy, 115: 1451-1458. Go to original source...
  2. Awotwe T.W., El-Hassan Z., Khatib F.N., Al Makky A., Baroutaji A., Carton J.G., Olabi A.-G. (2017): Developments of electric cars and fuel cell hydrogen electric cars. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42: 25695-25734. Go to original source...
  3. Dimitropoulos A., Rietveld P., Van Ommeren J.N. (2013): Consumer valuation of changes in driving range: A metaanalysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 55: 27-45. Go to original source...
  4. Egbue O., Long S. (2012): Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48: 717-729. Go to original source...
  5. Chu Y., Yihan W., Jin C., Songsheng Z., Zhaolin W. (2019): Design of energy and materials for ammonia-based extendedrange electric vehicles. Energy Procedia, 158: 3064-3069. Go to original source...
  6. Madhusudhanan A.K. (2019): A method to improve an electric vehicle's range: Efficient cruise control. European Journal of Control. 48: 83-96 Go to original source...
  7. Moreda G.P., Muñoz-García M.A., Barreiro P. (2016): High voltage electrification of tractor and agricultural machinery - A review. Energy Conversion and Management, 115: 117-131. Go to original source...
  8. Tamor M.A. (2019): Examining the case for long-range battery electric vehicles with a generalized description of driving patterns. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 108: 1-11. Go to original source...
  9. Zhou Y., Ruoxi W., Hewu W., Hua C. (2020): Optimal battery electric vehicles range: A study considering heterogeneous travel patterns, charging behaviors, and access to charging infrastructure. Energy, 197: 116945. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.