Res. Agr. Eng., 2024, 70(4):226-236 | DOI: 10.17221/80/2023-RAE

Ergonomic investigation on spraying task performance in paddy farming activitiesOriginal Paper

Dian Mardi Safitri ORCID...1,2, Novia Rahmawati3,, Winnie Septiani1,2,, Nora Azmi1,, Azizah Nurul Hanifati1,, Ummi Noor Nazahiah binti Abdullah4,, Norashiken binti Othman4
1 Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
2 Center for The Study of Ergonomics, Work Health, and Safety, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
3 Vocational School, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
4 Faculty of Engineering and Mechanical Technology, Universiti Malaysia, Perlis, Malaysia

The commodity rice in Indonesia and the administration of rice fields are given particular focus by the government. Spraying activities are known to increase the risk of exposure to chemicals for farmers, resulting in a loss of working days for 3–7 days. It is necessary to carry out ergonomic interventions for spraying activities to make the activity safer for farmers. This research aims to identify the ergonomics and safety problems of spraying activities in rice field farming, to analyse and develop intervention parameters to solve issues in spraying activities, and to generate innovative design concepts to overcome spraying problems. Prospective users assign importance weights to the twelve functional requirements. The light sprayer has the highest weight, meaning users need a lightweight sprayer. The relationship between the customer and the functional requirements can be strong, moderate, weak, and zero (no ties). This relationship determines the technical importance of the rating. From the assessment of the relationship between the customer and the functional requirements, it can be seen which technical specifications should be prioritised for developing the product. An automated system is the technical specification that should be prioritised because it has the most significant weight on meeting the consumer needs.

Keywords: agriculture; human factors; musculoskeletal problems; risk; safety and health

Received: July 30, 2023; Revised: October 1, 2024; Accepted: October 18, 2024; Published: December 31, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Safitri DM, Rahmawati N, Septiani W, Azmi N, Hanifati AN, Nazahiah binti Abdullah UN, Othman NB. Ergonomic investigation on spraying task performance in paddy farming activities. Res. Agr. Eng. 2024;70(4):226-236. doi: 10.17221/80/2023-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. Akao Y., Mazur G. (2003): The Leading Edge in QFD: Past, Present and Future. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(1): 20-35. Go to original source...
  2. Bilgel N., Bayram N. (2010): Turkish Version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS- 42): Psychometric Properties. Noropsikiyatri Arsivi, 47(2): 118-126.
  3. Caffaro F., Roccato M., de Paolis G., Micheletti Cremasco M., Cavallo E. (2022): Promoting farming sustainability: The effects of age, training, history of accidents and social-psychological variables on the adoption of on-farm safety behaviors. Journal of Safety Research, 80: 371-379. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Chander D. S., Cavatorta M. P. (2017): An observational method for Postural Ergonomic Risk Assessment (PERA). International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 57: 32-41. Go to original source...
  5. Chauhan H., Satapathy S., Sahoo A. K., Mishra, D. (2020): Mitigation of ergonomic risk factors in agriculture through suitable hand-glove materials. Materials Today: Proceedings, 26: 561-565. Go to original source...
  6. de Oliveira Müller, B., Bánkuti, F. I., dos Santos, G. T., Borges, J. A. R., da Silva Siqueira, T. T., & Damasceno, J. C. (2024). Sociopsychological factors underlying dairy farmers' intention to adopt succession planning. Animal - Open Space, 3: 1-8. Go to original source...
  7. Del Ferraro S., Falcone T., Morabito M., Messeri A., Bonafede M., Marinaccio A ., Gao C., Molinaro V. (2021): Cooling garments against environmental heat conditions in occupational fields: measurements of the effect of a ventilation jacket on the total thermal insulation. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics: 86. Go to original source...
  8. Finger G. S. W., Lima-Junior F. R. (2022): A hesitant fuzzy linguistic QFD approach for formulating sustainable supplier development programs. International Journal of Production Economics, 247. Go to original source...
  9. Franco W., Barbera F., Bartolucci L., Felizia T., Focanti F. (2020): Developing intermediate machines for high-land agriculture. Development Engineering, 5. Go to original source...
  10. Harith H. H., Mohd M. F., Nai Sowat S. (2021): A preliminary investigation on upper limb exoskeleton assistance for simulated agricultural tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 95. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Hota S., Tewari V. K., Chandel A. K., Singh G. (2020): An integrated foot transducer and data logging system for dynamic assessment of lower limb exerted forces during agricultural machinery operations. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 4: 96-103. Go to original source...
  12. Houshyar E., Kim I. J. (2018): Understanding musculoskeletal disorders among Iranian apple harvesting laborers: Ergonomic and stopwatch time studies. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 67(April): 32-40. Go to original source...
  13. Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2016): Quality Management for Organizational Excellence: Introduction to Total Quality: 1-8.
  14. Kjestveit K., Aas O., Holte K. A. (2021): Occupational injury rates among Norwegian farmers: A sociotechnical perspective. Journal of Safety Research, 77: 182-195. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Klerkx L., Jakku E., Labarthe P. (2019): A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90-91. Go to original source...
  16. Kociolek A. M., Lang A. E., Trask C. M., Vasiljev R. M., Milosavljevic S. (2018): Exploring head and neck vibration exposure from quad bike use in agriculture. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 66: 63-69. Go to original source...
  17. Akbar K. A., Try P., Viwattanakulvanid P., Kallawicha K. (2023): Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Farmers in the Southeast Asia Region: A Systematic Review, Safety and Health at Work, 14(3), 243-249 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Lee H. J., Oh J.-H., Yoo J. R., Ko S. Y., Kang J. H., Lee S. K., Jeong W., Seong G. M., Kang C. H., Song S. W. (2021): Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Associated Risk Factors among Farmers in Jeju. Safety and Health at Work, 12(4): 432-438. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. López-Martínez J., Blanco-Claraco J. L., Pérez-Alonso J., Callejón-Ferre Á. J. (2018): Distributed network for measuring climatic parameters in heterogeneous environments: Application in a greenhouse. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 145: 105-121. Go to original source...
  20. Mohamaddan S., Rahman M. A., Andrew_Munot M., Tanjong S. J., Deros B. M., Md Dawal S. Z., Case K. (2021): Investigation of oil palm harvesting tools design and technique on work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper body. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 86: 1-8. Go to original source...
  21. Nawi N. S. M., Deros B. Md., Rahman M. N. Ab., Sukadarin E. H., Nordin N. (2016): Malaysian Oil Palm Workers Are in Pain: Hazards Identification and Ergonomics Related Problems. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 16 (Suppl.1): 50-57
  22. Sari, R. R., Tanika, L., Speelman, E. N., Saputra, D. D., Hakim, A. L., Rozendaal, D. M. A., … van Noordwijk, M. (2024). Farmer Options and Risks in Complex Ecological-Social systems: The FORCES game designed for agroforestry management of upper watersheds. Agricultural Systems, 213. Go to original source...
  23. Simatupang J. W., Rohmawan E., Junior Z. (2021): The Importance of Drone Sprayer in Agricultural Sector Especially for Indonesian Farmers: 1-10.
  24. Statistics Indonesia. (2024). Indikator Pasar Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Februari 2024. Volume 15, Nomor 1, 2024. Jakarta, Indonesia: Statistics Indonesia [BPS].
  25. Sudiajeng, L., Widodo, L., Yogasara, T., & Safitri, D. M. (2024). Intervensi Ergonomi Pertanian. Malang: PT. Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup: 9-17
  26. Thamsuwan O., Johnson P. W. (2022): Machine learning methods for electromyography error detection in field research: An application in full-shift field assessment of shoulder muscle activity in apple harvesting workers. Applied Ergonomics, 98. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Thota J., Kim E., Freivalds A., Kim K. (2022): Development and evaluation of attachable anti-vibration handle. Applied Ergonomics, 98. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Vasconez J. P., Kantor G. A., Auat Cheein F. A. (2019): Human-robot interaction in agriculture: A survey and current challenges. Biosystems Engineering, 179: 35-48. Go to original source...
  29. Walker-Bone K., Palmer K. (2002). Musculoskeletal disorders in farmers and farm workers. Occup Med, 52:441-450. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Zanatta M., Amaral F. G., Giacomello C. P. (2021): Exposure of agricultural pilots to occupational whole-body vibration: The effects of runway maintenance and the stages of flight. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 81. Go to original source...
  31. Zelik K. E., Nurse C. A., Schall M. C., Sesek R. F., Marino M. C., Gallagher S. (2022): An ergonomic assessment tool for evaluating the effect of back exoskeletons on injury risk. Applied Ergonomics, 99. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.