Res. Agr. Eng., X:X | DOI: 10.17221/168/2025-RAE

Harvester service life impact on sugarcane field losses and product contaminationOriginal Paper

Kanya Kosum ORCID...1
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand


Mechanical sugarcane harvesting generates substantial material losses that are associated with the equipment age. This study evaluated the relationship between the harvester service life and the operational efficiency by analysing field losses and product contamination across machines with varying operational histories (1, 14, 16, and 17 years) in Chaiyaphum Province, Thailand, using a randomised complete block design. The results indicate that the 17-year-old machines exhibited 54% higher total losses (241.93 kg·ha–1) compared to the newer equipment (156.90 kg·ha−1). The field losses were attributed primarily to base cutting operations (36%) and roller mechanisms (34%), collectively accounting for 70% of the total losses. The contamination analysis revealed sugarcane tops as the predominant impurity source (57% The revenue loss analysis indicates excessive field losses from ageing equipment reducing the farm profitability by 12–18%. The non-linear relationship between the equipment age and performance demonstrates that maintenance practices significantly influence degradation patterns, providing critical insights for optimising mechanical harvesting systems.

Keywords: agricultural machinery; harvesting efficiency; equipment maintenance; sugarcane; mechanical degradation; revenue losses

Received: October 3, 2025; Accepted: February 5, 2026; Prepublished online: April 20, 2026 

Download citation

References

  1. Arnaiz-González Á., Fernández-Valdivielso A., Bustillo A., de Lacalle L.N.L. (2016): Using artificial neural networks for the prediction of dimensional error on inclined surfaces manufactured by ball-end milling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83: 847-859. Go to original source...
  2. Benedini M.S., Conde A.J. (2008): Systemic view of losses in mechanized sugarcane harvesting. In: Proc. 26th Int. Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Congress, Durban, 2008: 566-570.
  3. Bochtis D.D., Sørensen C.G., Busato P. (2014): Advances in agricultural machinery management: A review. Biosystems Engineering, 126: 69-81. Go to original source...
  4. Bramley R.G.V. (2009): Lessons from nearly 20 years of precision agriculture research, development, and adoption as a guide to its appropriate application. Crop and Pasture Science, 60: 197-217. Go to original source...
  5. Dhillon B.S. (2002): Engineering Maintenance: A Modern Approach. Boca Raton, CRC Press. Go to original source...
  6. Egan B.T., Rehbein C.A. (1963): Bacterial deterioration of mechanically harvested cut up sugarcane during storage over weekends. Proceedings of the Queensland Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 30: 167-172.
  7. Fountas S., Carli G., Sørensen C.G., Tsiropoulos Z., Cavalaris C., Vatsanidou A., Liakos B., Canavari M., Wiebensohn J., Tisserye B. (2015): Farm management information systems: Current situation and future perspectives. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 115: 40-50. Go to original source...
  8. Garside A.L., Bell M.J., Robotham B.G., Magarey R.C., Stirling G.R. (2005): Managing yield decline in sugarcane cropping systems. International Sugar Journal, 107: 16-26.
  9. Johnson P.C., Clementson C.L., Richard E.P., Jr. (2002): Relationships between extractable and total stalk saccharose in sugarcane. Field Crops Research, 77: 219-232. Go to original source...
  10. Kosum K., Bun-Art S. (2020): The losses of sugarcane harvested from a sugarcane harvester. Suranaree Journal of Science & Technology, 27: 010009.
  11. Larrahondo J.E., Briceño C.O., Rojas M. (2006): An assessment of after harvest sucrose losses from sugarcane field to factory. Sugar Tech, 8: 233-238. Go to original source...
  12. Ma S., Scharf P.A., Karkee M., Zhang Q. (2014): Sugarcane harvester technology: A critical overview. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 30: 727-739. Go to original source...
  13. Magalhães P.S.G., Cerri D.G.P. (2007): Yield monitoring of sugar cane. Biosystems Engineering, 96: 1-6. Go to original source...
  14. Maldaner L.F., Molin J.P., Canata T.F. (2022): An approach to sugarcane yield estimation using sensors in harvester and ZigBee technology. Sugar Tech, 24: 813-821. Go to original source...
  15. Manhães C.M.C., Garcia R.F., Correa Júnior D., Francelino F.M.A., Francelino H.O., Santos C.M.F.G. (2014): Evaluation of visible losses and damage to the ratoon cane in the mechanised harvesting of sugarcane for different displacement speeds. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5: 2956-2964. Go to original source...
  16. Miu P.I., Kutzbach H.D. (2008): Modeling and simulation of grain threshing and separation in threshing units - Part I. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 60: 96-104. Go to original source...
  17. Murthy D.N.P., Atrens A., Eccleston J.A. (2002): Strategic maintenance management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 8: 287-305. Go to original source...
  18. Neves J.L.M., Magalhães P.S.G., Moreira C.A. (2004): Evaluation of trash and losses in mechanical harvesting. Engenharia Agrícola, 24: 17-24. Go to original source...
  19. Peloia P.R., Milan M., Romanelli T.L. (2010): Capacity of the mechanical harvesting process of sugar cane billets. Scientia Agricola, 67: 619-623. Go to original source...
  20. Ripoli T.C.C., Ripoli M.L.C. (2004): Sugarcane Biomass: Harvesting, Energy and Environment. Piracicaba, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz. (in Portuguese)
  21. Salassi M.E., Breaux J.B., Naquin C.J. (2002): Modeling within-season sugarcane growth for optimal harvest system selection. Agricultural Systems, 73: 261-278. Go to original source...
  22. Sharma A., Yadava G.S., Deshmukh S.G. (2011): A literature review and future perspectives on maintenance optimisation. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 17: 5-25. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0.), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.