Res. Agr. Eng., 2011, 57(10):S30-S34 | DOI: 10.17221/58/2010-RAE

Comparison of numerical integration methods in strapdown inertial navigation algorithm

V. Cviklovič, D. Hrubý, M. Olejár, O. Lukáč
Faculty of Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovak Republic

The numerical mathematical theory provides a few ways of numerical integration with different errors. It is necessary to make use of the most exact method with respect to the computing power for a majority of microprocessors, because errors are integrated within them due to the algorithm. In our contribution, trapezoidal rule and Romberg's method of numerical integration are compared in the velocity calculation algorithm of the strapdown inertial navigation. The sample frequency of acceleration and angular velocity measurement was 816.6599 Hz. Inertial navigation velocity was compared with precise incremental encoder data. Trapezoidal method velocity error in this example was 1.23 × 10-3 m/s in the fifteenth-second measurement. Romberg's method velocity error was 0.16 × 10-3 m/s for the same input data. The numerical mathematical theory provides a few ways of numerical integration with different errors. It is necessary to make use of the most exact method with respect to the computing power for a majority of microprocessors, because errors are integrated within them due to the algorithm. In our contribution, trapezoidal rule and Romberg's method of numerical integration are compared in the velocity calculation algorithm of the strapdown inertial navigation. The sample frequency of acceleration and angular velocity measurement was 816.6599 Hz. Inertial navigation velocity was compared with precise incremental encoder data. Trapezoidal method velocity error in this example was 1.23 × 10-3 m/s in the fifteenth-second measurement. Romberg's method velocity error was 0.16 × 10-3 m/s for the same input data.

Keywords: Romberg's method; trapezoidal rule; accelerometer; gyroscope; micro electro-mechanical system (MEMS)

Published: December 31, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cviklovič V, Hrubý D, Olejár M, Lukáč O. Comparison of numerical integration methods in strapdown inertial navigation algorithm. Res. Agr. Eng. 2011;57(Special Issue):S30-34. doi: 10.17221/58/2010-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. Analog Devices, 2009. MEMS Inertial Sensor ADIS16405. Available at www.datasheetcatalog.com (accessed November 25, 2009).
  2. Grewall M.S., Weil L.R., Andrews A.P., 2007. Global Positioning Systems. Inertial Navigation, and Integration. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey. Go to original source...
  3. Kačeňák M., 2001. Rombergova metóda pre numerické integrovanie a jej implementácia v prostredí MATLAB. (Romberg's method for numerical integration and its implementation in the MATLAB application). Atca Montanistica Slovaca, 6: 82-87.
  4. Mošová V., 2003. Numerické metódy (Numerical methods). Olomouc, UP Olomouc.
  5. Shannon C.E., 1949. Communication in the presence of noise. Available at www.stanford.edu/class/ee104/shannonpaper.pdf (accessed August 18, 2011).
  6. Titterton D.H., Weston J.L., 2004. Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology. 2nd Ed. The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, USA. Go to original source...
  7. Vicher M. 2003. Numerická matematika (Numerical mathematics). Available at http://physics.ujep.cz/~mlisal/apl_nm/vicher_nm1.pdf (accessed August 18, 2011).

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.